Apologetics essay in new reason reformed revelation

This essay is the third of three. The first can be read herethe second here. It is not that they are unimportant, but that if believers seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness "all these things will be added to you" Matthew 5: The Two Kingdoms in Scripture:

Apologetics essay in new reason reformed revelation

Evidentialist Apologetics Carson on Presuppositional vs. Evidentialist Apologetics March 26, D. Carson, The Gagging of God: Zondervan,— At the risk of oversimplification, let us restrict ourselves to presuppositionalism, rational presuppositionalism, and evidentialism.

All three labels are loaded, and various proponents mean slightly different things by them. Moreover there is a tendency, especially among more popular writers, to caricature the other positions. You can line up evidence to support the truth of Christianity until you have exhausted yourself by your efforts, but no amount of evidence is sufficient to compel belief.

Did not Jesus himself say that even if someone came back from the dead, they would not believe? Evidentialism simply does not understand the implications of human finitude or the profound noetic effects of the Fall—and both limitations are exacerbated by postmodernism.

He acknowledges that there are controlling presuppositions, but thinks he can give adequate reasons to defend Christian presuppositions. Can a human being by reason find out God? Does not the record of New Testament preaching show that reasons were advanced in the bold advocacy of the gospel?

Moreover, precisely because postmodernism is so strong in the land, it is important to overturn presuppositionalist thought as a cop-out that inevitably ends in subjectivity and uncertainty. The debate has a long history, and a few lines will not begin to do justice to its complexities.

A sympathetic reading of some recent proponents of each position, however, suggests that at least some of the fences that cordon off each position from the others are beginning to come down.

He argues that the postmodernist rediscovery of the historical character of all human reasoning challenges what is an axiom among many Enlightenment thinkers: But this postmodern stress on the historical character of all human reasoning does not entail absolute relativity unless epistemological foundationalism is true, which says that truth must be found at the beginning of human reasoning.

Van den Toren denies this is true, and proposes to account for human knowledge on the analogy of reading a book: So far he sounds like an updated evidentialist.

But he then argues that the contemporary Christian apologist should insist that the Christian faith offers the only hermeneutical basis on which we can build an adequate understanding of reality. At several points, he becomes aligned unwittingly with, say, Clouser, whose updated presuppositionalism, in the Dooyeweerdian frame, was published, astonishingly, by the presses of a Catholic university.

This is a confusing age. But quite clearly, the impact of postmodernism is prompting revisions.The New Testament continually highlights the tension between the kingdom that is coming and the affairs of this age.

See a Problem?

Although Jesus declared that "the kingdom is within you" (Luke ), his disciples were constantly wondering when he would actually restore all things. The Islamic religion claims that the Qur’an, revealed allegedly by the angel Gabriel to the prophet Muhammad beginning in A.D., is the inspired and inerrant word of God.

Top of page Who Is Jesus?. Who is Jesus? This is the question of the ages. No figure in history has had as much influence as Jesus Christ. First check out this video featuring a young boy's explanation: Jesus Throughout the Bible Most of what we know about Jesus comes from the New Testament.

Faith and Reason. Traditionally, faith and reason have each been considered to be sources of justification for religious belief. Because both can purportedly serve this same epistemic function, it has been a matter of much interest to philosophers and theologians how the two are related and thus how the rational agent should treat claims derived from either source.

Back to: Bible Commentaries Genesis ⇐ ⇒ Leviticus. For more great commentaries on Exodus, be sure to check: Commentaries on the Pentateuch, Commentaries on the Whole Old Testament & Whole Bible Commentaries..

Apologetics essay in new reason reformed revelation

Order of Contents The Best Commentaries 7 More Commentaries 12 The Early Church 2 First Half of Exodus 2 Chapters in Exodus. Revelation and Reason has 40 ratings and 6 reviews. Paul said: {{EDIT: This is actually half of what I wrote. Start by marking “Revelation and Reason: New Essays in Reformed Apologetics” as Want to Read: (Divine Aseity and Apologetics) essay the best.

In (iii) I enjoyed most of the essays, /5.

The American Empire